Well? Are you?

Should humans and robots bunk up together? Are these intimate relationships even possible? That’s what HUMANS NEED NOT APPLY exhibit Tickle Salon attempts to discuss.

Is there a line drawn in the sand for what areas of life robotics can conquer, and have we crossed it? These are just some of the questions raised by visitors upon viewing this intimate robot.

Allow me to paint you a picture of a typical Tickle Salon session — a willing participant removes their shirt, and lies flat on the bed as if waiting for a massage. The robot is activated, and its ceiling-high threads move to lower the tassels towards the visitor’s body, all accompanied with a sound reminiscent of a claw-machine found in childhood arcade… then — contact!

The tassels now slowly move across the body, both examining and caressing. Some find this ticklish, others sensual. This experience can last from ten to twelve minutes. Some visitors cry with delight when told this, as they’re in it for the long haul! As the session comes to a close, the claw machine noise sounds again; your moment with the stroking bot is over. “Well, how was it?” we ask. And this is when the fun begins.

Our visitors had so many mixed reactions to Tickle Salon — from outright hating the experience to wanting one for their own home! We took it upon ourselves to document visitors’ reactions in a very #dataisbeautiful kind of way…

Pretty mixed bag, right? Wait until you see the male to female user ratio!

The month of March had more males partaking in Tickle Salon than females, at 64% of the total usage versus female usage of 36%.

For the month of April, male usage increased (72%) while female usage decreased (28%).

May was the quietest and shortest month, with HUMANS NEED NOT APPLY ending on 21st May. Male usage of the exhibit was still greater than female usage.

The final tally for Tickle Salon usage, with a total usage of 316 people, 215 males and 101 females. From this data set, males held a majority usage throughout the exhibition.

There you have it! From our data collection, males seem to want to explore intimate robot relationships more than female visitors — or maybe women didn’t want to take their shirts off! We also found from our research that Wednesdays and Fridays were the most popular days for tickling, and the least popular day was Saturday  —  and Tickle Salon was so popular with two of our users that they came back a second time.

So are robots here to replace our intimate relationships? Who knows! Some of our visitors state they would love for something like this to exist in the future, while other outright oppose the idea. For now, though, let’s just have it as a speculative idea….


Big Robots Don’t Cry

Stony 1.0 is one of my favourite exhibits in HUMANS NEED NOT APPLY, because of the ethics and intentions behind the exhibit.

Stony 1.0 is a grave-tending robot created by Itamar Shimshony, and it is an exhibit that examines the possibilities and implictions of robotics creeping into the very personal ceremony of mourning the dead. Stony 1.0’s main duty as eternal grave-tender is to place small stones and red roses on resting places, using its robotic and very unsympathetic arm to do so. The bot is also capable of spraying a small amount of water, to illustrate the symbolic washing of a burial place that is part of many religions.

Not only do I personally enjoy Stony 1.0 as an exhibit, I also thoroughly enjoy discussing it at length on tours; mainly to see visitors’ reactions to the controversial nature of this piece. Firstly, I ask the visitors to guess the purpose of the robot. Some hazard a guess that it’s a gardening robot — which isn’t too far off; others guess that it collects roses and stones for its own personal use, which is quite far off. When I finally reveal the actual function of Stony 1.0, it is generally met with resounding disbelief. How could a robot function as a mourner?!

We have grown up with the idea that robots are built to make our lives easier, and to allow us to move from very mundane jobs to more professional careers; nowadays, we also see robots as our companions — think Tamagotchi or Cozmo, our playful little companion bot and another exhibit featured in HUMANS NEED NOT APPLY.

But mourning the dead is a very humanistic act; certainly, some animals visually show grief, like elephants, giraffes and chimpanzees, but surely the act of mourning isn’t a job we can shove off to robots, is it? How far will we go with robotics? It’s as if Stony 1.0 is doing the ‘chores’ of mourning with no feeling.

The reactions from visitor vary. Some really enjoy the idea of a grave-tending robot, and mention that if you die and have no family, or your family live far away and you wish to carry out these rituals after you pass on, this robot could be the solution. Others totally oppose the idea of a robotic mourner, believing the act to be a right reserved for humans.

When you watch the robot complete its tasks, after some time you will start to notice that it is not the most meticulous of creatures. Stones and roses will be strewn across the floor rather than on the graves; the machine possesses no computer vision, so is unaware that it hasn’t completed its task correctly and, at times, it drives over one of the displaced stones on the floor and gets its wheels jammed. Upon closer inspection, one will notice large white marks on the stonework — they’re not lichens, but battle scars from Stony 1.0’s physical actions.

This piece begs the question: is this our future? Will robots take over every aspect of our lives even after we die? Will graveyards turn out like lights-out factories where robots rule? How many ‘chores’ will we off-load onto robotics? Only time will tell. Watch this grave space…